
Here's what happens when you have a communications monopoly:
The Defense Department isn't trying to "muzzle" troops by banning
YouTube and MySpace on their networks, a top military information
technology officer tells DANGER ROOM. Rear Admiral Elizabeth Hight,
Deputy Commander of Joint Task Force-Global Network Operations, says
that the decision to block access to social networking, video-sharing,
and other "recreational" sites is purely at attempt to "preserve military
bandwidth for operational missions."
Computer_center_400x Not that the 11 blocked sites are clogging networks
all that much today, she adds. But YouTube, MySpace, and the like "could
present a potential problem," at some point in the future. So the
military wanted to "get ahead of the problem before it became a problem."
—
Military Defends MySpace Ban (Updated Yet Again),
Noah Schachtman, DangerRoom,
18 May 2007
How much bandwidth is it using?
We don't know; the Admiral won't say.
Now if the U.S. military's real reason is to keep the troops from posting
information that could get some of them killed, I could understand that.
But if so, why are they trotting out this lame excuse?
And for that matter, why is the U.S. commander in Iraq saying
military blogs are providing good accurate descriptions of the
situation on the ground?