« Google Wins by Losing 700Mhz Wireless Spectrum Auction | Main | Big picture: Net Neutrality vs. Social Control by Big Media »

March 25, 2008


Gregg Weber

I am not a lawyer but my understanding of "arbitrary" is that when one has to draw a line somewhere and that place where you draw it has no or little relation to the situation it is an arbitrary decision. Example: When is a person human, the decision that a person is human only after the head comes out, thus allowing partial birth abortions, is arbitrary. There are other times previous to this (and some would claim humanity is given only after the child has survived the terrible two's thus allowing infanticide and capital punishment for tantrums).
A decision, or rather a line of decisions would be capricious when it is not zeroing in on the target. Examples: Estimates of the value of Pi and with each getting more accurate, or zeroing in on an enemy battleship by firing broadside after broadside, getting closer all the time, bracketing it, and finally hitting it. Both would not be capricious in my mind. However making an arbitary decision biased to the side you want is capricious. Especially when both sides do it so that one shell lands way short and the next way long. One decision is way for and the other way contrary.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad