Chandler commented on Wildfire Precedents
about how some timber companies had mismanaged underbrush cleanup.
That's probably true in some places, but
the details of the forestry and fire problems in the west and in the southeast
are different.
Fire is the usual method to clear underbrush in southeastern pine forests,
But not the kind of fires we're seeing this year.
Back in the 1960s there was the rich world with low birthrate
and long life expectancy and the poor world with high birthrate and
low life expectancy.
Nowadays there's much overlap and many countries that were formerly
in the poor camp are almost indistinguishable from the rich camp.
Seeing China climb up one way and then the other over time sinks
this concept in more effectively than reading about it.
Apparently the U.S. Senate wants Internet radio providers to use Digital
Rights Management (DRM), in S.256, also known as the “Platform Equality
and Remedies for Rights Holders in Music Act” (PERFORM):
Then there are the issues related to the use of DRM. Since there’s
no such thing as an open DRM standard broadcasters will likely pick and
choose from the motley assortment of available options. Not only will this
create confusion among consumers, but it will likely leave many users out
in the cold. Very few DRM schemes are cross-platform, and the ones that
are (FairPlay) would likely not be available to Internet broadcasters.
Chances are that many broadcasters would select Microsoft’s DRM
system, effectively turning Internet radio into a Windows-only medium
(and ironically leaving Zune users out of the loop).
Biglione points out that Internet radio already pays the same music
licensing fees as traditional radio, plus extra fees.
To also require this extra technology could put many Internet radio
stations out of business.
His point is that everybody hates to lose time, money, emotions, whatever
that have been contributed to communication, but people often don't think
of the key feature is that such contributions being unreciprocated is what
makes them lost.
In other words, if the other parties put in just as much, then there
is reciprocation and a relationship of some sort, including at least
the possiblity of mutual benefit.
Skin in the game, if you will.
If they don't, then you've only been suckered.
This is a good point, although it has a number of exceptions
and maybe even more ramifications.
Jon Harmon demonstrates that it's hard to write science fiction these days,
when events often happen sooner than expected.
In 2004 a flash film, Epic 2014 proposed that in 2011 the New York Times would
sue the conglomerate aggregator Googlezon for copyright infringement.
Well, it's already happening:
the Beijing News is suing Chinese aggregator tom.com in Shanghai.
For copyright infringement.
In China.
The irony!
The suit is only for damages of $400,000, but it's an interesting test case.
Is suing your competitors good risk management?
I guess we'll see.
I found this quote used by someone else as a one sentence
summary of the social effects of the three laws of thermodynamics
(often paraphrased as you can't win, you can't break even, and you
can't get out of the game).
It may be true that you, singular, can't win, etc.
But we can win if we collaborate and adapt....
Gunnar has a good post about
evolving risk.
A small startup company has high business risk (easy to fail)
and low security risk (not much to steal),
while a big successful company has low business risk
and high security risk.
Pretending those different kinds of risk don't change,
or that they change in the same direction, leads to problems:
When the business reality is dynamic and the security model is static, then errors creep in.
Everybody's used to YouTube clips of popular TV shows these days.
Beyond that, some TV shows appear only on the Internet, such as these
in
Jeff Pulver's network2.
Which will be the first broadcast or cable TV show to move entirely to TV?
Coiuld it be Stargate SG1?
What's this got to do with risk?
This is a new paradigm.
Producers who stick with the old TV paradigm are going to have business problems.
If you haven't read Chris Anderson's book,
The Long Tail yet, I highly recommend it.
Before the Internet, the numbers of movies that could be sold were limited
by the number of movie screens or shelf slots in video stores.
With the Internet, via Netflix or Amazon or many online stores
you can buy all sorts of movies that never would have made it.
Jared Diamond: Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed The author examines societies from the smallest (Tikopia) to the largest (China) and why they have succeeded or failed, where failure has included warfare, poverty, depopulation, and complete extinction. He thought he could do this purely through examining how societies damaged their environments, but discovered he also had to consider climate change, hostile neighbors, trading partners, and reactions of the society to all of those, including re-evaluating how the society's basic suppositions affect survival in changed conditions.
Recent Comments